November 21, 2024

Search

Find us on facebook

Contributors

Ladies: Two men. One makes excellent money but you only see him roughly once a week. The second man is an employee, makes almost enough to cover everything but there is always something you can’t do because of prioritized financial plan reasons. However, he’s home and will be home every night. Which would you choose?

Guys: Physical appearance or good cooking? Ok let’s say there are two women, one is physically attractive to you, I mean smoking! The other one is appealing, but not like the first one... HOWEVER she can cook! Both are nice, caring, God-fearing, etc... Which would you choose?

NADIRAH Angail

Hard question! They’re both really important. I’ll assume all things
are equal other than the financial piece, right? So, they’re both great catches, but one just has fatter pockets? Well, I’ll start off by saying they’re both doable. There isn’t any choice that’s better than the next, but my gut reaction is to choose the wealthy one. I know, I’m coming off like a gold digger, but financial security is just so important, especially for the type of life I know I’d want to lead. I don’t need fancy cars, clothes, houses, etc. I couldn’t care less about any of that, but I have always known that I would want to stay home with my children while they were little. That means my husband needs to make enough to allow me to do that. He doesn’t have to be rich, but needs to be able to handle the bills on his own. It doesn’t sound like that would be the case with the second guy. The question says I’d see the first guy “roughly once a week,” so I’ll take that to mean his schedule has at least a bit of flexibility so that maybe we could squeeze in a little more time. Also, if he’s making good money (and saving too), hopefully he should be able to get to a point where he can work smarter instead of harder. Then, he’d still be bringing home the money without such a big time sacrifice. If I took the “stay at home mom” piece out of the equation, I’d probably choose the second guy.

Hesham El Dahmy

The choice is easy. The smoking babe... every time, each time... all the time. If it comes to only being able to cook... don’t need it. And mind you food is important to me. But let’s see... no matter how good a Crème Brûlée or Makarona Bashamel she makes... nothing beats a sexy smile from a lovely creature with sexy curves... I mean that is the shit people fight and are willing to die for, baynama mafesh 7ad hayda7i bi nafso 3shan gozeen 7mam!

Cooking is an additional tool for those that don’t have the physical appeal to tie a man down naturally! You can teach her to cook, but you can’t change her to be smoking! Also al mar2a tonk7 li arb3... beauty one of them, cooking is not! Plus if she is that hot, you probably would dine out much anyway. It’s how men are wired, it’s all in the DNA…

OLA Gaafar

I would choose the second man. For one, I won’t trade spending enough time with my beloved ones for extra cash or fancier material possession. Though I have a strong belief that money and happiness are complementary; I have a stronger belief that I don’t have to own a “fortune” to be as happy and complacent. If it takes tighter cash to free up more time for family gathering, so be it. It is not healthy nor is it a balanced lifestyle to forgo a certain essential factor in order to have some other factor in abundance.

Copyright © 2011 Publications are by Dear Guest DG S.A.E Co. for Publishing, Printing and Distribution. All rights reserved.
Site Designed By Egygo.net, Managed by M3 webz for Web Design Services in Egypt